PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE

Most Fortune 500 learning systems are expensive museums.

Beautiful. Well-documented. Visited occasionally. And completely disconnected from how work actually happens.

SSUNDAR. re-engineers performance systems.

Engage.
Systems architecture. Judgment-centered design. Measurable outcomes. Fortune 500 scale. Three systems only.

WHAT WE BUILD

Capability architecture.

Others offer programs. We build systems. The difference: programs end. Systems compound.

Three systems. That's it. Each one engineered to make capability structural, measurable, and permanent.

01

Judgment-Centered Design.

Leadership systems built on decision architecture, not competency checklists. Every intervention maps to a measurable judgment output.

40% faster decision velocity in ambiguous contexts
02

Capability Architecture.

Multi-skilled talent pools replace siloed expertise. Systems designed for role fluidity, not static job descriptions.

3.2× improvement in cross-functional deployment speed
03

Performance Engines.

Learning systems re-engineered to drive business outcomes. Direct linkage from capability investment to P&L impact.

68% reduction in capability-to-performance lag

EVIDENCE

Metrics, not testimonials.

Full Archive.

GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY

12,000-person engineering org. 23% annual attrition in mid-level technical leadership. Exit interviews: "lack of growth architecture."

Leadership attrition

23%9.1%

18 months

Internal mobility

8%34%

12 months

Time-to-competency

14 mo6 mo

Role transitions

FINANCIAL SERVICES

Post-merger integration. 4 legacy cultures. Existing playbook adoption at 4%. Four separate competency models with zero cross-functional alignment.

Framework adoption

4%89%

9 months

Decision consistency

31%78%

Cross-unit quarterly

Integration timeline

36 mo19 mo

vs. estimate

GLOBAL CONSULTING — BIG FOUR

$180M annual learning function. Zero measurable linkage to engagement profitability. Board mandate: prove ROI or restructure.

Learning ROI

Unmeasured4.2×

First fiscal year

Budget efficiency

$180M$112M

Same output quality

Cross-practice

11%41%

12 months

CONTACT CENTER — FORTUNE 300

8,500-seat operation across 6 sites. Quality scores plateaued for 3 consecutive years despite increasing L&D spend. Leadership layer managing by escalation, not judgment.

Quality scores

72%91%

9 months

Escalation rate

34%12%

6 months

First-call resolution

58%81%

12 months

GLOBAL CAPABILITY CENTER

Newly established GCC scaling from 200 to 2,000 in 18 months. Zero capability architecture. Leadership hired from 11 different companies with no shared operating model.

Time-to-productivity

16 wk7 wk

New hires

Leader readiness

23%84%

12 months

Delivery consistency

61%93%

Cross-team SLA

Drag or scroll →

HOW IT WORKS

Three phases. Architecture-grade deliverables.

01

4–6 WEEKS

DIAGNOSIS

System audit of existing capability infrastructure. Gap analysis between current architecture and performance requirements. Quantified friction points. Measurable gaps.

02

6–8 WEEKS

DESIGN

Capability architecture blueprinted to business outcomes. Every system component maps to a measurable performance output. Not a strategy deck — a technical blueprint.

03

12–16 WEEKS

DEPLOYMENT

Phased implementation with built-in measurement. Real-time adjustment based on performance data. Continuous optimization. The data tells you if it's working.

Drag or scroll →
SSUNDAR. — Judgment-Centered Leadership Design

PRINCIPAL

SSUNDAR is Shyam Sundar MV.

RECOGNITION

Brandon Hall Group Excellence Award

PEDIGREE

Amazon. Accenture. Cognizant.

SCALE

7,000+ employee capability systems

ROLE

Systems architect, not a consultant

linkedin.com/in/shyamsundarmv →

Your learning system is either a performance engine or an expensive museum.

If you're uncertain which one you have, you have a museum.